Software Reliability in an On Demand World

KEYNOTE, NOVEMBER 18, 2003 ISSRE

Nicholas Bowen

IBM Corporation

 

Access to information is the most critical requirement on information technology solutions today. Since the onset of the microprocessor era, the IT industry has evolved through the following three predictable phases: access to information; integration of disparate systems; and on demand capability. The fact that this metamorphosis occurred in an era of economic uncertainty has placed tremendous pressure on information technology companies, such as IBM, to provide highly available software systems, while at the same time reducing total cost of ownership.

In the traditional SMP server space, hardware reliability has made significant gains, increasing the demand for software systems to be of the utmost quality. In the near future, the emerging scale-out computer architectures (e.g. Blades) with built-in redundancy and a high availability strategy based on a "rapid detection and reconfiguration" approach will transform this demand into a requirement.

 

This presentation summarizes how software has transformed over time to improve the reliability of applications; relate the effect this transformation had on the industry; describe the attributes that make up a highly available system; apply technologies, such as clustering and virtualization, to satisfy the requirements of high availability systems; explain how to exploit technological advancements to take full advantage of the increased capabilities of reliable hardware components; and finally, discuss implications of software availability on the future.

 

Dr. Nick Bowen is Vice President of UNIX and xSeries Software for IBM?s Server Group. Prior to that, Dr. Bowen held several positions in IBM's Research Division. Most recently he was Director of Computing Utilities where he spearheaded the definition of the "intelligent infrastructure" research program. The group had many exploratory system projects for which they received numerous awards. In addition, they made significant contributions to AIX, OS/390, AS/400, and xSeries servers as well as many products within IBM's software group. Prior to that Dr. Bowen made technical contributions to the S/390 Parallel Sysplex effort and led several of the OS/390 initiatives to embrace internet and object technologies.

 

Dr. Bowen received his B.S. degree in computer science from the University of Vermont, M.S. degree in computer engineering from Syracuse University, and Ph.D. in electrical and computer engineering from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst. He joined IBM at East Fishkill, New York where he worked in a datacenter and learned the trials and tribulations of maintaining a 24x7 datacenter.

 

Dr. Bowen?s IBM career spans over 20 years, which includes expertise in high availability, memory management, and parallel processing. He is a senior member of IEEE, a member of ACM, and a guest lecturer at Yale University. His research interests are operating systems and fault-tolerant computing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Next Generation Secure Computing Base (NGSCB)

KEYNOTE, NOVEMBER 18, 2003 ISSRE

Paul England

Microsoft Corporation

 

Microsoft?s Next Generation Computing Base (NGSCB) provides a high assurance computing environment on open computer systems like PCs. Traditional high assurance systems are built from very restricted hardware and software combinations, and are designed with specific security goals. This effectively means that high assurance systems are closed systems of restricted flexibility. Further, in order to maintain security, the trusted computing base both hardware and software must change infrequently.

 

Conversely, open systems like PCs support a great variety of hardware and software from many suppliers, and the hardware and software computing base changes very rapidly so that users can use new devices and features. This openness and flexibility has served the PC ecosystem well, but are at odds with the basic design principles of high assurance systems. As the PC plays a larger role in our daily lives, it is necessary to provide a secure execution environment without disturbing the openness that has contributed to the PC?s success. NGSCB is designed to give us the best of the worlds of openness and security. NGSCB hardware allows two or more partitions to be established by a small and simple machine monitor. In one partition users can run a simple operating designed for security, and in the other they can run a large feature rich operating system supporting any hardware device the user desires. The monitor in conjunction with NGSCB hardware ensures that the secure OS is protected from viruses and trojans in the main OS.

 

This talk will sketch the NGSCB hardware and software system, and then discuss the software engineering challenges that we are facing, and the steps we are taking to build a secure product. Our design assumption is that the monitor, the secure OS, and hosted applications will be under attack from sophisticated adversarial system code. Steps we are taking to make the system secure, even in the face of such adversaries, range from aggressive use of formal methods in algorithm development and program verification, through the use of tools in development and testing.

 

Paul England works in Microsoft?s Security Business Unit where he is the principal architect of NGSCB. Prior to this he spent 5 years in Microsoft Research. Much of this time was spent on design, development and evangelization of the ideas now being productized by Microsoft and its hardware partners. Before Microsoft, Paul was at Bell Communications Research working on various aspects of distributed systems. He started his professional career at Bellcore studying the electrical and optical properties of novel semiconducting and superconducting materials and devices. Paul holds a Ph.D. in condensed matter physics from Imperial College in London.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Economics of Software Reliability

KEYNOTE, NOVEMBER 19, 2003 ISSRE

Barry Boehm

University of Southern California

In most software applications, investments in software reliability compete with investments in such alternate capabilities as functionality, response time, adaptability, and speed of development. Investigating the tradeoffs among these sources of investment raises a number of significant questions about the nature of software reliability and its interactions with other desired software capabilities. These questions include:

 

? What software capabilities are your various stakeholders really relying on (liveness, responsiveness, quality of service)? What happens when these aspects of "reliability" conflict?

? Is success in the marketplace a monotone function of achieved reliability?

? Is quality really free in all situations? How can one determine how much investment in reliability is enough in a given situation?

? Are there ways to quantify the tradeoffs among schedule, cost, and reliability? Is "faster, cheaper, better" really achievable?

? Many current software reliability-related techniques assume that every requirement, use case, test case, and defect is equally important. How cost-effective are such value-neutral methods?

? What are the strengths and weaknesses of emerging "agile methods" in coping with reliability-related investments?

 

This talk will explore these and related questions from the perspective of the emerging discipline of Value- Based Software Engineering. It will show that, at least in many cases, reasoning about the economics of software reliability can lead to more satisfactory outcomes than will the application of value-neutral techniques.

 

Dr. Barry Boehm is TRW Professor of Software Engineering, Computer Science Department, USC. Director, USC Center for Software Engineering. Dr. Barry Boehm served within the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) from 1989 to 1992 as director of the DARPA Information Science and Technology Office and as director of the DDR&E Software and Computer Technology Office. He worked at TRW from 1973 to 1989, culminating as chief scientist of the Defense Systems Group, and at the Rand Corporation from 1959 to 1973, culminating as head of the Information Sciences Department. He entered the software field at General Dynamics in 1955. His current research interests involve recasting software engineering into a value-based framework, including processes, methods, and tools for value-based software definition, architecting, development, and validation. He is currently a Principal Investigator on the NASA High Dependability Computing Program. His contributions to the field include the Constructive Cost Model (COCOMO), the Spiral Model of the software process, and the Theory W (win-win) approach to software management and requirements determination. He is a Fellow of the ACM, AIAA, IEEE, and INCOSE, and a member of the National Academy of Engineering.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Future of Computer Software Systems; Commodity or Service?

KEYNOTE, NOVEMBER 20, 2003 ISSRE

Raymond Paul

Department of Defense

Web Services (WS) received significant attention recently by government agencies and computer industries. WS provides a new architecture/paradigm for building distributed computing applications based on XML. It provides a uniform and widely accessible interface to glue the services implemented by the other middleware platform over the Internet by utilizing standard Internet protocols such as WSDL, SOAP, and UDDI.

 

WS is a young technology, and many issues still need to be addressed, such as finalizing draft specifications, runtime verification and validation, and quality assurance by the UDDI servers. Many keen observers agree that WS represents a new, significant trend for software systems integration that will be developed, structured, acquired, and maintained. For example, instead of buying and maintaining software, software can be leased and downloaded when needed. Thus, software upgrade will be automated because the latest version will be used when the service is called at runtime. WS implementation requires a loosely coupled architecture, where new services can be added at runtime and old services can be replaced.

 

Furthermore, vendors will compete to supply the most dependable and/or marketable services on the web, and this also changes the way software industries earn their revenue. Quality assurance as well as security and privacy will be important for both service clients and providers, including those who serve as intermediate agents such as UDDI servers.

 

WS provides a new opportunity for quality and globalization. Companies, regardless of their nationalities, languages, and culture, must now compete in a global market where the only rule is interoperability quality via architecture and interfaces. It is no longer true that certain companies have an advantage due to market segmentation, whether local, national, or international. If a company does not compete in the global service market, its business will decline as new services are published on the web. Companies that have great software quality technology will rise above companies that only have great financial resources.

 

The concepts of WS are far beyond software. In the future, hardware will also have a corresponding service where vendors will supply new components to fit into existing well-published architecture for specific applications.

 

Raymond Paul: As a professional electronics engineer, software architect, developer, tester, and evaluator for the past 24 years, Dr. Paul has held many positions in the field of software engineering. Currently, Dr. Paul serves the as the technical director for command and control (C2) policy. In this position, Dr. Paul supervises command and control systems engineering development for objective, quantitative, and qualitative measurements concerning the status of software/systems engineering resources and evaluates project outcomes to support major investment decisions. This measurement data is required to meet various Congressional mandates, most notably the Clinger-Cohen Act.

 

Dr. Paul holds a doctorate in software engineering and is an active senior member of the IEEE Computer Society. He has published more than 64 papers on software engineering in various technical journals and symposia proceedings, primarily under DoD, ACM, and IEEE sponsorship.